Our subject matter is teaching about the current healthcare economic environment in Canada, and our curriculum is very comprehensive and insightful, so I believe that at the undergraduate level, our curriculum is designed to satisfy any student interested in this type of program.

However, it has to be admitted that our program has some prerequisites, and that is that some foundation in economics is required. Our course involves a lot of terminology, data, and formulas, which can be confusing to students who do not have a foundation in the subject matter and may lose their interest. Therefore, I think we have to simplify our course content and teach it in an easy-to-understand way. For example, we can divide the teaching of this item into two modes: zero and basic. We would eliminate a lot of formulas in the zero-based model and explain the terminology in an easy-to-understand way and only teach the current concepts of Canadian healthcare economics to students as much as possible because it is important to keep their interest in this category. Then for students with a basic understanding, I think our teaching model can remain the same, because it is important to make sure that they receive more in-depth content.

Besides, personalized learning is important. This can include adapting content to learners’ abilities and interests, providing exercises and challenges at different difficulty levels, and using adaptive learning technologies to adjust the pace of instruction based on learners’ performance. I hope inclusion and diversity can respect the background, culture, and special needs (e.g., language) of the learners.